Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousPTA Errors: How Hard to Fight
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
Many recently issued patents should receive a further extension of their patent terms based on the USPTO?s miscalculations of PTA and the Federal Circuit?s decision in Wyeth v. Kappos. To receive that those additional months of protection, however, the patent holder may have to file a civil action against the PTO. The question for patentees will be whether the expected value of those additional months at the end of the patent term (years from now) are worth the up-front expense of filing suit.
I am confident that most applicants will find it not worthwhile to go about the effort of seeking the additional PTA extension. As I wrote in 2009, most patents expire before the end of their alloted patent term because applicants fail to pay the maintenance fees. [Link] That said, more than 45% of patents are maintained in-force through the patent term.
In the next few days, we may see a few firms ramping-up as PTA specialists in a way that could reduce the cost of suing.
Links:
- PTA Statistics
- Patent Maintenance Fee Payments
- USPTO Re-Calculating PTA
- Wyeth v. Kappos
- PTA for Fun and Profit (Kamholz)
As a side-note, Irving Kayton's company offers PTA Calculation for $200 per patent. (PatentTerm.Com).
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on January 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Hurricane Ike
Gulf Coast Residents Fight for Compensation
FDA Warns of Potentially Fatal Errors with GDH-PQQ Glucose Monitoring Technology
Glucose Monitoring Technology FDA Warns of Potentially Fatal Errors
Medical Tubing Errors Leading to Adverse Events Including Death
Medical Tubing Errors Leading to Adverse Events Including Death
Medical Errors
Annual Cost to Insurers Nearly $1.5 Billion
Dobutamine Hydrochloride Injection
Labeling Errors Prompts Recall of 250 mg/20 ml Injections









