Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesIntellectual Property Contingency Consortium
By Philip Brooks
I received an inquiry recently from a reader that was concerned about whether he was covering all of his legal options, but hesitant to retain an attorney. I offered to provide him with the names of a few attorneys that handle patent infringement matters on contingency, but then yesterday I came across another possible resource.
The Intellectual Property Contingency Consortium is a group of law firms and licensing companies that assists clients - corporations and individuals - in the enforcement of patent, trademark, and copyright rights on a contingency basis.
From the West Coast to the East Coast, members of the Consortium can enforce your valuable intellectual property rights. The Consortium can scale attorney staffing up or down depending on the size of your litigation. The technical expertise of the Consortium members extends over a wide spectrum - from consumer goods to high technology.
If you would like a Consortium Law Firm Member to evaluate your case for possible representation, please email us at info@ipcontingency.com with a chronology of the events of your case, together with any relevant documents in pdf or Word format.
You should not consider a Consortium Law Firm Member to be representing you unless and until both you and the Consortium Law Firm(s) execute a written retention agreement for services.
They also offer links to companies that offer the following services:
- Damage Experts
- Liability Experts
- Prior Art Searchers
- Help in Identifying Potential Licensees & Infringers
- Litigation Tools for Winning Information
Access the Consortium and resource links here. If you have worked with one of the Consortium law firms, please include a comment below that summarizes your experience.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on January 27, 2010 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Compellent, Storage Engine, et. al.
$10.5 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
General Electric Co. and SABIC Innovative Plastics
$3 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
Property ID Class Action
Settled for $39 Million
Chicago Golf Course
101 Year Old Owner Must Get $25 Million for Property
Zurn Pex Inc.
alleging faulty and defective plumbing led to property damage.
Sony Lithium Ion Batteries Recalled
Reports of Overheating, Burns and Property Damage

Intellectual Property And Access Can Co-Exist, US Rightsholders Say
No trade secret : Jorda in the Hall of Fame
UNCITRAL Lays Groundwork For Policy On IP Assets And Financing
The Use of Rhetoric When Discussing Intellectual Property Law
The Museum of Intellectual Property
The History of Scottish Intellectual Property Law







