ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel when qualifying an applicant for employment

ADVERTISEMENTS
Appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel when qualifying an applicant for employment
Matter of City of New York v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 61 AD3d 584

The New York Civil Service Commission reversed a determination made by the New York City Police Commissioner that disqualified a candidate for appointment as a police officer for medical reasons: the applicant suffered from sleep apnea.

The Appellate Division vacated the Civil Service Commission?s ruling, finding that it was ?arbitrary and capricious because it was irrational and disregarded relevant facts.?

While the Commission found that ?NYPD had no written standard on the condition of sleep apnea,? the court said that there was a written standard that was given to the Commission in which it stated that sleep apnea ?can be detrimental to job performance when vigilance is necessary."

Commenting that "An appointing authority has wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates . . . particularly . . . in the hiring of law enforcement officers, to whom high standards may be applied," the court said that an appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel, even if those findings are contrary to those of professionals retained by the candidate, and the judicial function is exhausted once a rational basis for the conclusion is found."

The Commission?s decision, said the court, ?was irrational because it disregarded the informed medical opinions of NYPD's doctors and was based instead on the brief and conclusory statement of [the applicant?s] physician, which did not address in detail the condition at issue as it might affect the physical demands of police duty.?

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on February 03, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0061 secs (from cache 11/06/26 15:05:34)