Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyA Thought Experiment on Constitution 2.0
By Orin Kerr
Here?s a thought experiment. Imagine widespread public opinion in the United States demanded a new Constitution to reflect current public opinion. Specifically, let?s imagine that this happened at a time when the inevitable pendulum swing of public opinion happened to be in a liberal direction. The state conventions met and ratified a new constitution ? call it ?Constitution 2.0? ? that had some vague terms but was designed to enshrine what we now think of as liberal/progressive political views. Now imagine twenty more years have passed and the pendulum swings back, and we enter into a time when American politics shifts to a more conservative direction. Here?s the thought experiment: What would liberal and conservative constitutional scholars say at the time about how to interpret Constitution 2.0? Which side would be originalists? And what would the non-originalist theories look like?
Copyright © 2010
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on February 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

The Museum of Underappreciated Art
A Transaction Cost Approach to Constitutional Interpretation
TOM MAGUIRE LAUNCHES a challenging thought experiment. Plus, Ann Althouse on Joe Klein, with an a









