Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations

Legal Commentary

: Discriminations

Utah Democrats Oppose Racial Equality

A joint resolution (HJR24) seeking to amend the Utah constitution to prohibit racial and ethnic preferences, modeled on California?s Proposition 209 and similar measures in Washington and Michigan, is working its way through the state legislature.

Democrats, of course and as usual, oppose the measure.

While proponents say HJR24 is about fairness and upholding the intent of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, opponents are asking why the measure needs to be engraved in the state?s highest law.

Minority Leader David Litvack said that House Democrats have united against the measure. And, speaking for himself, he questions the need and the rush.

?They have no proof that reverse discrimination even exists,? said the Salt Lake City Democrat. ?Yet we?re going to ask citizens to amend the state Constitution.?

?That?s a sacred document,? Litvack added. ?It should not be amended based on myth and misperception.?

I wonder if Leader Litvack and the Democrats have any objection to the identical value being ?engraved? in the nation?s highest law via the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Why do they react so strongly to a constitutional provision that would prohibit behavior they claim to oppose and assert does not even occur?

Someone should ask Leader Litvack if he and his fellow Democrats oppose all the affirmative action policies and programs supported by Democrats in the federal government and other states. If they support those policies, they should be honest enough to admit that they oppose HJR24 in Utah not because it is unnecessary but because they oppose its substance, prohibiting preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity.

Full post as published by Discriminations on February 22, 2010 (boomark / email).