ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> ThePopTort

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: ThePopTort

Happy as a Pig Farm in Slop

By Joe Consumer

ADVERTISEMENTS
Hog That silly ?lipstick on a pig? brouhaha during the 2008 presidential election campaign came to mind today when we read about a Missouri jury verdict yesterday.  The jury awarded around $11 million to folks living near an 80,000-head hog farm run by industrial food giant Premium Standard Farms, now owned by Smithfield Foods and the state's largest hog producer, over the operation?s stifling and intolerable odors. The awards weren?t huge: ?$825,000 for each of the 13 plaintiffs. A 14th plaintiff was awarded $250,000, and the 15th got $75,000? and included no punitive damages.

The company is appealing, calling it a ?gang trial? and a ?gang verdict.? They also believe it was unfair because the company complied with government regulations ? an argument we?ve heard before and one that the U.S. Supreme Court isn?t too fond of.

Mostly what the families want is odor abatement.  Their attorney said, "?If we sit down and talk, we can include more than money,? ... ?It's common sense. Nobody wants to live across the street from 80,000 hogs.??

Premium Standards Farms has itself had its own problems.  Last month, 1,500 northern Missouri residents met with the state Attorney General because of an upcoming deadline for the company to comply with a 1999 court order to implement ?$25 million in pollution-reducing equipment? ? the deadline has been expanded since ?and is still being implemented.?  Meanwhile, ?In January, the U.S. Justice Department also reached a $900,000 settlement with Smithfield Foods Inc. and Premium Standard Farms over premerger rule violations.?  (here)

Pig-lipstick Missouri, it turns out, has a strong history of trying to get local control over operation of these huge corporate hog farms.  The Wall Street Journal wrote:

As livestock operations have grown more industrialized, residents across rural America have banded together to try to keep them out. They say the bigger farms are wreaking havoc on their communities, polluting waterways with manure that can kill fish and sicken people. A popular tool has been county-level "local control" ordinances that govern where a large farm can locate.

While many states have retained authority over the siting of livestock farms, Missouri has a staunch local-control movement that took root in the early 1990s as corporate-controlled hog processors moved in. In 1999, the Missouri Court of Appeals held that a county can implement an ordinance governing livestock farms, including where they are located, if it is rooted in concerns over public health. Today, more than a dozen of Missouri's 114 counties have the ordinances.

Another thing lipstick clearly can?t mask ? the smell of rotten eggs. 

Full post as published by ThePopTort on March 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)