ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS


Chamber of Commerce Opposes Webb Bonus Tax Amendment to Extenders Bill

In a letter to the Senate, the US Chamber of Commerce said that an amendment to the Tax Extenders Act, HR 4213, that would impose a 50 percent tax on bonuses paid at firms that received TARP and other federal emergency funds would hamper efforts to resolve the ongoing financial crisis, restore economic growth, spur job creation, and is likely unconstitutional. With the punitive use of taxation to target specific companies, said the Chamber, businesses would be reluctant to participate in future emergency programs. Such an outcome would limit the government?s ability to manage crises in the future.

The amendment would impose a 50 percent excise tax on the bonuses of employees at banks, financial firms, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that exceeded $400,000 in 2009. Any employee who received a bonus larger than $400,000, the salary of the President of the United States, would have to pay a 50 percent tax on the portion of the bonus over $400,000. This is a one-time tax on firms that received more than $5 million in TARP and other federal emergency assistance funds. It affects only bonuses received this year that are based on performance in 2009. The revenues generated would be used for deficit reduction. According to Sen. Boxer, the excess bonus tax will return to the Treasury about $10 million.

The amendment would add a new Section 4999A to the Internal Revenue Code that would impose the tax on any covered employee who receives a covered excessive 2009 bonus, which includes a retention bonus. Covered employees are defined as both as employees of the company and non-employee directors of a major federal emergency economic assistance recipient.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on March 09, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/04/26 23:20:30)