Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Marital privilege not available in administrative disciplinary actions taken against law enforcement personnel

Marital privilege not available in administrative disciplinary actions taken against law enforcement personnel
Riverside County Sheriff's Department v Astrid Megan Reynolds, Court of Appeal [California], 4th District, Division 2, Docket #E043187

Astrid Megan Reynolds served as a deputy sheriff with the Riverside County [California] Sheriff?s Department. She was served with disciplinary charges alleging that she failed to inform her superiors that her husband admitted to her that he had stolen and used metamphetamine [generally referred to as ?speed?]. Found guilty, she was fined one-days pay.

Reynolds challenged the disciplinary action taken against her and Arbitrator Louis M. Zigman ?overturned the discipline because it was based on a communication between Deputy Reynolds and her husband that was protected by the marital privilege.? The Sheriff?s Department appealed the arbitrator?s decision.

The major issue, said the court, is whether the marital communications privilege applies in law enforcement administrative investigations and hearings. It ruled that ?the privilege does not apply in law enforcement administrative investigations and hearings? as California courts ?have consistently held that the more fundamental, constitutional privilege against self-incrimination does not apply in law enforcement administrative investigations for reasons of public policy.?

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on March 12, 2010 (boomark / email).