ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Kentucky

: Kentucky Cases

CONTRACTS: Barnett v. Community Trust Bank, Inc. (COA 12/18/2009)

By Michael Stevens

ADVERTISEMENTS
Barnett v. Community Trust Bank, Inc.
2009-CA-000164 12/18/2009 2009 WL 4877691

Opinion by Judge Lambert; Senior Judge Harris concurred; Judge VanMeter dissented by separate opinion. The Court vacated and remanded a summary judgment entered by the circuit court dismissing appellant?s claims of negligence, breach of contract and unjust enrichment filed against the appellee bank and appellant?s brother?s ex-wife. The claims arose after a bank employee changed the death beneficiary on a CD jointly owned by appellant and his brother without inquiring as to whether the brother wished to remove appellant as a joint owner and did not follow bank policy by cashing out the jointly-owned CD and opening a new individually-owned CD. The Court held that there was a genuine issue of material
fact as to whether the brother would have actually consented to or authorized the transaction in question if the bank employee had verified ownership of the CD and then properly discerned the brother?s intent by adhering to bank policies. The bank?s acknowledgment that it failed to follow its own policies and procedures, as well as the employee?s testimony that he would have executed the transaction differently had he known about the joint ownership, supported the conclusion that the bank breached its duty of care. The Court then held that the record was sufficient to allow a jury to decide whether appellant?s brother intended to completely divest him of any ownership or beneficial interest in the CD. The Court also held that if a jury should find in appellant?s favor and then erroneously distributed the funds to his brother?s ex-wife, then viable claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment still existed.

Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on March 18, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 07:09:00)