ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Lawsites

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Miscellaneous

: Lawsites

Another Ethics Panel Clears Total Attorneys

By Robert J. Ambrogi

ADVERTISEMENTS
The state of Washington is now the 11th to close its ethics investigation of <a href="http://www.totalattorneys.com/">Total Attorneys</a> with no finding of wrongdoing. <a href="http://www.wsba.org/info/operations/odc/default.htm">Washington State Bar Association</a> Senior Disciplinary Counsel Jonathan Burke issued a letter saying the state would not pursue complaints filed against 13 Washington attorneys over their use of Total Attorneys for Internet marketing, according to a <a href="http://www.totalattorneys.com/press-releases/eleventh-state-closes-attorney-ethics-investigation-regarding-total-attorneys-advertising/">statement issued today</a> by Total Attorneys<br /><br />As I <a href="http://www.legaline.com/2010/01/conn-dismisses-total-attorneys-ethics.html">wrote here in January</a>, Connecticut recently reached a similar outcome, concluding there was no cause to file charges against five attorneys there. Disciplinary authorities in Illinois, Hawai'i, Vermont, Alabama, Arizona, Idaho, New Mexico, Colorado and Alaska have also closed their investigations of Total Attorneys with no findings of wrongdoing.<br /><br />The investigations came in response to a series of ethics complaints filed in some 47 states by a Connecticut lawyer who maintains that the Total Attorneys model violates ethics rules.<br /><br />In Washington, the disciplinary counsel concluded, "The websites do not attempt to hold themselves out as lawyer referral services or fit the definition of 'lawyer referral service' in Comment 6 to RPC 7.2." He also address the claim that the sites' pay-per-performance model violated 11 USC 504(a), which prohibits the sharing of fees in bankruptcy cases. The letter says that the attorneys in question "did not share or agree to share 'compensation' with the websites."<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3958829-2165211882233060545?l=www.legaline.com%2Flawsites.html' alt='' /></div>

Full post as published by Lawsites on March 19, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0135 secs (new cache)