Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportPurifoy v. Howell (Cal. Ct. App. - March 26, 2010)
By Shaun Martin
It's a neat little case, and one in the public interest. Basically about how long shelters have to keep animals before they whack 'em.
It's a straightforward statutory interpretation case, so not doctrinally all that interesting. Plus, the right result, I think, is a matter of common sense -- and one that Justice Jenkins (and the rest of the panel) get exactly right. "Business days" don't include Saturdays, even if a shelter is open. At least in this context. And the owners of pets get three days exclusivity to redeem the animal, and then additional days thereafter of nonexclusive redemption rights.
So good job by the Court of Appeal. As opposed to the trial courts here, which shuttled the matter to multiple judges with multiple (contradictory) rulings, ultimately resulting a (just) reversal.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on April 02, 2010 (boomark / email).

Purifoy v. State, Case No. 2D08-1665 (Fla. App. 4/15/2009) (Fla. App., 2009)
Rivers v. Howell, Ky COA, Domestic Violence
Revenge Poop Misses Target, Say Cops
Denise Howell - Directories crafting profiles without permission








