ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsIn re Suitco Surface, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2010)
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Kevin E. Noonan -- It is a bedrock principle of patent practice that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office gives the terms of claims under examination their broadest reasonable construction. The rationale is that, in this way, the applicant has the opportunity to argue or amend the claims to be as broad as the prior art permits, and precludes the applicant from expanding beyond these limits the scope of granted claims it asserts against accused infringers. Regardless of the soundness of this practice as a policy matter, as applied by the Office it can (and frequently does) exceed the...Full post as published by Patent Docs on April 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Administration Releases Surface Transportation Security Priority Assessment
US Patent 7651769 - Nanofiber velcro
US Patent 7399691 - Aligning nanotubes for crossbar array
US Patent 7456972 - Surface plasmon induction in MWCNTs
US Patent 7524543 - Durable optics with surface modified nanoparticles








