Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentMI: Gant retroactive; no GFE
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The search of defendant’s car was unreasonable under Gant. While SCOTUS was silent on retroactivity v. applying a good faith exception, the court concludes it must be retroactive. People v. Mungo, 2010 Mich. App. LEXIS 610 (April 13, 2010), on remand from People v. Mungo, 483 Mich. 1091, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1343 (2009):
Whether reliance on case law can form a basis to invoke the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule is a significant legal question. The United States Supreme Court is silent on this issue. The Sixth Circuit and Tenth Circuit federal courts of appeal have expanded the good faith exception to apply to a law enforcement officer’s reliance on case law. In McCane and similarly in Lopez, however, it was the clear and established law of the circuit that law enforcement officers were vested with the right to search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on April 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

SCOTUSwiki Preview: Arizona v. Gant
The Holding of Gant, and Some Initial Questions as To Its Application::
Does Arizona v. Gant Extend Beyond Passenger Compartments:








