Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogSekhon on Equality & Equal Protection Jurisprudence
By Lawrence Solum
-
Equal protection scholars have all but abandoned the possibility that a theory of equality might explain Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence. I develop just such a theory and use it to elucidate the Court?s reasoning in recent affirmative action and voting rights cases. In these cases, the Court has relinquished categorical colorblindness in favor of race-consciousness under limited circumstances. The Court has justified this approach as necessary for protecting the ?individual,? although the Court does not precisely explain what it means when it uses that term. I argue that a theory of equality always depends upon a theory of identity and that the ?individual" is an example of the latter. The Court uses ?individual? to mean a being who experiences civic identity as primary to other identities, such as race, religion, occupation, and so on. ?Identity hierarchy? describes this prioritization of civic identity. I rely on liberal political theory to define "identity hierarchy" and "civic identity" and argue that both concepts underwrite the Court's recent affirmative action and voting rights cases. I conclude that the Court?s equal protection jurisprudence would have greater analytic integrity if it were to promote civic identity without reliance upon identity hierarchy.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on April 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Women and the Law
Earnings Gap
Women and the Law
Glass Ceilings:
Women and the Law
Women in the Justice System (judges, attorneys)
Women and the Law
Ttile IX
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Hutchinson Oil
Over $75,000 settlement reached in consumer protection lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
School Misrepresentation
Lehigh Valley College agrees to pay $200,000 settlement for violating consumer protection laws.

Hendricks: Contingent Equal Protection: Reaching for Equality After Ricci and PICS"
Quick Hit - Interesting Take on the Ricci Case and Equal Protection
(Mis)Construing Kapp to Preclude the Impoverished
Early Cases - Privileges and Immunities
New election funding law endangers democracy (Anchorage Daily News)
So whats the equal protection clause for, anyway








