Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> China Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: China Law BlogOn The State Of China IP Protection. Straight From The Source.
By Dan Harris and Steve Dickinson
I. Fair and Efficient Adjudication of Intellectual Property Cases According to Law has Made the Judicial System a Leading Force in Intellectual Property Protection II. Judicial Protection for Intellectual Property has Served the Needs of Socioeconomic Development and has Observed and Delivered the National Intellectual Property Strategy III. Enhanced Judicial Supervision and Guidance has Created Greater Consistency in Adjudication Practices and Decision-Making IV. Capacity Building for Intellectual Property Judges has Improved Judicial Competence and Quality ConclusionThough a bit self-serving and at times jingoistic, it really is an excellent piece in that it sets forth where the court has been and where it hopes to go and it does an excellent job of using facts in support of both. Say what you will about the protection of intellectual property in China, the reality is that on that score China is getting better every year. If you have an interest in China intellectual property, I urge you to read it. When we first started this blog more than four years ago, we said intellectual property protection would slowly get better in China, but would really start to take off when Chinese companies themselves started developing their own intellectual property and then demanding protection of that. That day has arrived for trademarks and for a slightly lesser extent, for patents as well. The recent decision awarding Microsoft a relatively large judgment in a copyright case is a further indication that day is not too far off for copyright as well.
Full post as published by China Law Blog on April 27, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
China Green Agriculture, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
China Green Agriculture, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
Infant Formula From China
FDA Warns it May be Contaminated Melamine
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.

Protect Your Patent Rights in China
Case Study: Protecting Your Brand in China
Russell McOrmond on Protection From DRM
Parties Accept WTO Dispute Settlement Report On China IP Protection
USPTO to Host New China IP Seminar
Global Manufacturing in China Changes Tune as Exports Slow and India Rises








