Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Sacramento Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Sacramento Injury Lawyer BlogSacramento Family Seeks Punitive Damages For Elder Abuse, Part 9 of 11
By Moseley Collins, Esq.
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this elder abuse/medical malpractice case and its proceedings.)
Plaintiff will not be able to state a prima facie case of neglect by clear and convincing evidence. With regard to plaintiff's pressure sore, it started out as a friction or shear injury that occurred during a transfer to or from her bed. Plaintiff's expert will opine it occurred when plaintiff was getting occupational therapy. There can be no possible argument to equate this injury with the level of conduct necessary to entitle plaintiff to punitive damages. Such injuries can and do happen in hospitals, particularly with obese, totally dependant patients such as plaintiff.
The expert testimony at trial, and opinions of the treating physicians at the time, will that the worsening of the initial injury was a function of plaintiff's underlying medical condition. Plaintiff's experts have conceded this. Plaintiff will not be able to show, by clear and convincing evidence, that any of the alleged negligence that occurred after the initial injury caused further harm.
Similarly, the events of October 10, 2006, cannot equate with elder abuse. Plaintiff's claim of inadequate monitoring cannot rise to the level of reckless or conscious disregard of plaintiff's safety; prospectively there was no way any of the staff could have known how long it would take for the transport department to transport plaintiff back to her room. Further, the nurse who was caring for plaintiff exercised his judgment in addressing her blood pressure; he did not neglect her. Plaintiff's liability theories are based upon a retrospective analysis together with assumptions unsupported by the evidence. The argument that the should have called a physician, or that he should have taken other measures to address plaintiff's blood pressure cannot satisfy what is required to establish a prima facie case of elder abuse by clear and convincing evidence.
Full post as published by Sacramento Injury Lawyer Blog on April 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Financial Elder Abuse - Financial Exploitation, Elder Abuse Lawyers
Financial Elder Abuse alleging seniors are taken advantage of for their finances.
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Estate Planners Face Elder Abuse Class Action
California Estate Planners Face Elder Abuse Class Action
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Financial Elder Abuse
allegedly taken advantage of in Southern California.
Marshall Astor
Over $1.35 million in property, art and jewelry returned in elder care abuse lawsuit.

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards Punitive Damages Based on Elder Abuse
Richard Dreyfus Seeks Punitive Damages Against Dad
Seniors Victimized in Financial Elder Abuse Scams
Seniors Duped in Financial Elder Abuse Scams








