Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Althouse

Legal Commentary

: Althouse

"But my opinion of Russell changed when he admitted to Boston Rob that he did not play to win."

"You can?t be the best if you?re not playing to win. He can hoop and holler all he wants about 'America choosing' but that?s not this game. This game is about convincing a jury of your peers that you are the most deserving person. He didn?t do that. But my problem is not that he didn?t accomplish that goal, it?s that it wasn?t his goal in the first place."

So says Jeff Probst who owes us an apology then for that "All Stars" season where, upon revealing who the jury gave $1 million to, he announced that they were giving away another million dollars to the player America votes for. And it was so obviously a device to give money to the player that won in the alternative way of entertaining America ? Rupert. If Russell was playing to win in the alternative Rupert fashion of making himself a popular TV character, then Jeff should take some responsibility for that.


Don't miss the video interview with Queen Sandra at the link.

Full post as published by Althouse on May 18, 2010 (boomark / email).