Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Estate Planning
: Toronto Estate Law BlogRule of Pecore -Hull on Estates #208
By Hull and Hull LLP
Listen to:Rule of Pecore -Hull on Estates #208
This week on Hull on Estates, Chris Graham and David Smith revisit the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada and Pecore. This case considered the approach taken by Pecore.
The following issues are examined:
• Applying the presumption of resulting trusts to various fact scenarios.
• Evidence required to rebut the presumption for different classes of assets.
• Types of corroboration permissible under the Evidence Act to rebut the presumption.
If you have any comments, send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave a comment on our blog.
Christopher M.B. Graham – Click here for more information on Chris Graham.
David M. Smith – Click here for more information on David Smith.
Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on May 25, 2010 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Wills, Trusts and Estates
legal help with your will, trusts or estates.

Presumptions of Resulting Trust and Advancement
"Arbitrators and Bias: International Dispute Resolution"
For Dan Hull, congratulations. For the rest of us, something to aspire to.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Finds Estates Responsible for Taxes








