ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Womble Trade Secrets Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Womble Trade Secrets Blog

Where Trade Secrecy Meets Environmental Risk: Determining Whether to Use Certain Oil Dispersants in the Gulf

ADVERTISEMENTS

Andrew Schneider of aol.news has written an interesting piece regarding the potential use of a certain oil dispersant in the Gulf of Mexico. He reports that scientists in the U.S., Canada, South America and elsewhere have pleaded with the government not to approve one option for dealing with the massive oil spill: a dispersant that contains unidentified and possibly untested nanoparticles.


The scientists are particularly concerned about nano-based dispersant produced by Green Earth Technologies. He explains the company is not at all subtle about lobbying hard to obtain expedited approval for the use of the nano-dispersant. The company's green logo is a large G with wings with "Save the Earth" on one side and "Sacrifice Nothing" on the other.


But before we throw millions of gallons of this dispersant onto the spill and affected areas - don't we need to know what is actually in this stuff?


That's the focus of this piece and the letter the scientists wrote to the EPA.


"We should not blindly trust a company that will not disclose the exact nature of the manufactured nanomaterials it proposes to dump into the sea. You or I wouldn't trust a stranger who wanted to dump undisclosed chemicals in our backyards, and the EPA shouldn't trust this corporation," said Ian Illuminato, health and environment campaigner for Friends of the Earth, which distributed the letter to EPA.


Apparently in the case of this nano-dispersant, the governement does not know what the ingredients are because the company claims a legal privilege of keeping its composition secret so as to protect their 'confidential business information'. And that's the crux of the dilemma. Doesn't the government and the broader global scientific community have a right to know what exactly they're about to throw in the ocean before they throw it?


This is an interesting piece detailing a rare conflict between trade secret interests and the public interest. You can read it by clicking on the title to this blog post.

Full post as published by Womble Trade Secrets Blog on May 28, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.015 secs (new cache)