ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> ACLU Newsroom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: ACLU Newsroom

Senate Rejects Wasteful Border Enforcement Amendments

By ACLU

ADVERTISEMENTS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 27, 2010
 
CONTACT: (202) 675-2312; media@dcaclu.org
 
WASHINGTON – The Senate today voted against amendments to an Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill (HR 4899) that would have redirected about $2 billion of federal stimulus funding into massively increased detention and enforcement along the southwest border. The amendments were offered by Senators Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and John Cornyn (R-TX). The American Civil Liberties Union and its affiliates along the southwest border objected to the amendments as a waste of federal resources. 

The amendment offered by Senator Kyl would have fully funded Operation Streamline, a program at the southern border that mandates federal criminal prosecution of people charged with minor, non-violent acts such as improper entry into the United States. Operation Streamline has diverted already scarce federal law enforcement and judicial resources away from prosecuting violent crimes like drug trafficking and organized crime and has forced federal prosecutors and defenders to expend precious time and resources on misdemeanor illegal entry cases.

Senator Cornyn's amendment would have funneled nearly two billion dollars in personnel, technology and resources into border enforcement activities which have a track record of ineffectiveness.

The following can be attributed to Joanne Lin, ACLU Legislative Counsel:

'The Senate acted calmly and rationally today by not succumbing to heated political rhetoric. Throwing $2 billion of the taxpayers' money at the southwest border would not have protected the civil rights and liberties of Americans at the border or in the rest of the country. The Senate today stood firm in favor of sensible immigration enforcement, without sacrificing civil liberties.'

Full post as published by ACLU Newsroom on May 27, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)