ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

Critics of Access and Congressional Action: The Boomerang Effect

By J Robert Brown Jr.

ADVERTISEMENTS

As Congress moves forward on financial reform, one things seems certain.  The SEC will get the rulemaking authority to allow shareholders access to the company's proxy statement for their nominees. 

It is clear that this is the result of critics of access, particularly those that threatened to challenge the SEC's rulemaking authority in the area.  Few were as strident on the issue as the Chamber of Commerce.  The Chamber all but threatened to sue the agency if it adopted the rule.  See Update On Shareholder Access, Shareholder Bill Of Rights And Other Washington Efforts On Corporate Governance, Thomas Quaadman, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Oct. 4, 2009 ("This is the third time in six years that the SEC is considering implementing shareholder access. While previous efforts have failed, this comment period has proven to be no less controversial. Proponents of shareholder access are quietly confident that the third time is the charm, however, history and potential legal challenges may prove them wrong.").

The challenge to rulemaking was never very strong.  It mostly arose out of the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable that struck down the SEC's attempt to impose one-share, one-vote, on the stock exchanges.  Access, in contrast, merely involved disclosure, something well within the SEC's authority.

Nonetheless, the threats likely contributed to the decision of Congress to include access in the financial reform process.  Once adopted, the litigation threat will disappear.  More to the point, the legislation will allow the Agency to be more decisive in the exercise of its authority.  Had authority been unclear, even marginally, the Commission might have taken an approach to the rule that was designed to reduce the risk of legal challenge.  This might have resulted in higher ownership thresholds or longer time limits, making access less useful.

Congress is about to take away the litigation risk.  Critics of access are to be thanked for the development.   

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on May 29, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0029 secs (from cache 11/04/26 03:34:13)