Real Estate & Property Law

Scalia, J.: "How Much Wood Would A Woodchuck Chuck If A Woodchuck..."

By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)

Things I never thought I would see in a Supreme Court opinion include the riddle "how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood," but there it is, in black and white on page 11 of Justice Scalia's opinion today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009):

One cannot know whether a takings claim is invalid with-out knowing what standard it has failed to meet. Which means that JUSTICE BREYER must either (a) grapple with the artificial question of what would constitute a judicial taking if there were such a thing as a judicial taking (reminiscent of the perplexing question how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?), or (b) answer in the negative what he considers to be the ?unnecessary? constitutional question whether there is such a thing as a judicial taking.

Full opinion here.

Full post as published by inversecondemnation on June 17, 2010 (boomark / email).