ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: SCOTUSBLOG

Academic Round-Up

By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group

ADVERTISEMENTS

I want to thank everyone for their patience as it has been a tough few weeks for me in light of some pressing deadlines and conflicting commitments. I realize that we have a backlog of articles for the academic round-up, but I hope to catch up in the next two or three months with regular updates. The following articles are particularly timely, given the Court’s (and this blog’s) focus on the Heller case:

The University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law will publish an article by Nathan Kozuskanich (Historian at Nipissing University) entitled “Originalism, History, and the Second Amendment: What Did Bearing Arms Really Mean to the Founders?,” see here. This is an interesting piece because it makes extensive use of digital archives of early American newspapers, pamphlets, broadsides, and Congressional proceedings published between 1763 and 1791. Professor Kozuskanich ultimately concludes that both the collective and individual rights paradigms are too “limiting in their conception of arms bearing and ownership in early America.” Instead, he finds that the use of “bear arms” had a military meaning, rendering it a “civic right linked to militia service.”

Ross Davies (George Mason University School of Law) has posted an interesting piece on SSRN entitled “Which is the Constitution?,” see here. The piece is forthcoming in the Winter 2008 edition of the Green Bag 2d. In the context of Heller and the Second Amendment, Professor Davies asks the provocative question of whether the Court has the power to authoritatively say what the text of the Constitution is, rather than only what it means. He asks that question in the context of which version of the Second Amendment–those with zero, one, two, or three commas–governs. As he notes, “identifying and preserving a single, agreed-upon version of a text produced by our federal constitutional ratification processes can be much more difficult than one might imagine,” and the Second Amendment is no exception. I highly recommend this short eleven-page piece.

Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on March 15, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0073 secs (from cache 11/07/26 08:47:44)