Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment

Criminal Law

: Fourth Amendment

E.D.Mich.: Frisk of duffle bag was unreasonable without feeling it first

By John Wesley Hall, Jr.

Defendant’s duffle bag made a “thud” when it was dropped, and it was searched for weapons. The court finds that the frisk of the duffle bag was unreasonable when looking to the government’s authorities where there was more information or even a feel of the bag on whether there was gun inside. Here, no. United States v. Davis-Devine, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60043 (E.D. Mich. April 21, 2010): Contrasting the officer's actions in Williams to Officer Reese's actions in the present case shows what Officer Reese could have done differently. In the present case, Officer Reese testified that he picked up Defendant's duffle bag from the floor, and immediately opened it. After securing the bag and ameliorating any purported safety concern, Officer Reese did not: (1) ask Defendant whether he could open the duffle bag; (2) ask Defendant what was in the duffle bag; or (3) feel the duffle bag to attempt to determine if it contained a weapon...continue to full post

Full post as published by Fourth Amendment on June 19, 2010 (boomark / email).