Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Food Liability Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Food Liability Law BlogLoyalty Cards and Product Recalls
By Kenneth Odza

Last week, a supermarket chain, Wegmans, learned that an employee working in the produce department contracted Hepatitis A. Like many supermarket chains, Wegmans, based in Rochester, New York, maintains a customer loyalty card system. According to the Buffalo News, , “the store plans an outreach to its customers they know purchased potentially affected produce by using Shoppers Club data to contact them via automated telephone calls.”
Loyalty cards were not designed to assist grocers in providing recall and food safety information. Many companies, in fact, face hardware and software problems in using their loyalty card databases to notify customers about issues with products purchased with the card. Many grocers do not require complete or accurate contact information. Privacy concerns are also a factor. A grocer does not know when it contacts a customer whether it is speaking to the customer or to someone else in the household. It is not hard to imagine a situation in which a household member does not want purchases (e.g., birth control, alcohol, or tobacco) or health conditions known to others in the household.
On the other hand, some believe that customers expect grocers to use their loyalty card databases for just this purpose. Traditional means of recall notice--press releases, signage in the stores, etc.--may not be as rapid as a phone call or email. Timing can make the difference between recalled food being consumed or not.
No matter whether grocers follow Wegmans’ policy of personal notification, a good business practice (and litigation avoidance tactic) may be for a grocer to disclose clearly to customers its policy about using the loyalty card information to provide notice of product safety issues. For grocers who use the database to phone or email consumers, a clear policy will avoid the golden rule that “no good deed goes unpunished.” For grocers for whom personal recall or safety notices are impractical or constitute privacy violations, a clear policy will create clear expectations and may mitigate against litigation.
Full post as published by Food Liability Law Blog on February 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Recall
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Adams Extract & Spice
Recalls Product due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
Food/Supplements
involving food poisoning, food product recalls, false advertising or labeling, vitamin, weight loss and diet supplement issues.
Ethex Corporation Product Recall
Gourmet Chicken Sausage Product
Recalled due to Mislabeling for Allergen
Chantix Suicide
alleging the smoking cessation product is linked to increased suicidal behaviors.
Space Heaters
Vornado Air Circulation Systems Inc. agrees to $500,000 defective product CPSC fine.

CPSC and NHTSA Recalls for August 2008
CPSC and NHTSA Recalls for January 2008
"GCs Need to Be Prepared in Case of Product Recalls"
Product Recall Information for March 2008
E-mail alerts help consumers keep up with recalls
Consumer Product Safety Commission Recalls for July 2008








