ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> AdamsDrafting

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: AdamsDrafting

When the Deal Signs and Closes Simultaneously But the Contract Is Structured for a Deferred Closing

By Ken Adams

ADVERTISEMENTS

In a phone call with a law-firm M&A partner today, I was reminded that sometimes M&A contracts reflect a deferred closing even though the parties actually do a simultanous signing and closing.

If the signing and closing are simultaneous, the contract would usually contain deal provisions, representations, indemnification provisions (unless the target is public), and boilerplate, as well as any post-closing obligations.

If the closing is scheduled to take place sometime after signing, the contract would typically also contain obligations to be performed before closing, conditions that have to be satisfied before the parties will be required to consummate the transaction, and termination provisions. These additional components greatly complicate matters. It would be unfortunate to use a deferred-closing structure for a deal that uses a simultaneous signing and closing?you’d spend time building an elaborate structure that ultimately not only proves to be useless but also adds confusing clutter.

In the early stages of any deal, it may be unclear whether the closing will be deferred. In that case, it may be that you have to draft for a deferred closing, so as to keep your options open?it would be awkward to convert a deal from a simultaneous-signing-and-closing structure to a deferred-closing structure. But if you find that you’re able to do a simultaneous signing and closing, I’d then strip down the contract accordingly.

I recall someone’s once suggesting that even with a simultaneous signing and closing, it’s best to use a deferred-closing structure because it’s useful to have the contract contain a list of closing conditions?in this context, that means a list of (1) anything that would have to be in place before the parties sign and (2) any items to be exchanged at signing. But you can incorporate that kind of list without imposing on the contract an all-out deferred-closing structure.

Any thoughts?

Full post as published by AdamsDrafting on July 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/01/26 01:58:59)