Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentCA5: Essentially, hostages = exigent circumstances
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Officers had exigent circumstances for an entry. [With all the laboring to find justification, the fact of “hostages” one would think would be enough.] Also, exigent circumstances were not manufactured. United States v. Flores-Castaneda, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13786 (5th Cir. June 28, 2010) (unpublished):*
In this case, agents testified that (1) a cell phone associated with the alien smugglers was inside the residence, (2) alien smugglers generally employ guns in their trade; (3) after the agents knocked on the door, they heard movement inside but Flores-Castaneda did not open the door for approximately two minutes, which seemed long to the officers; and (4) a man inside the residence spotted the agents, turned, and ran back into the interior of the house despite the agent's request for the man to return to the door...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on July 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

TX: Prisoners set fire and take two hostages at GEO Reeves Co Detention Center
People v. Chung (Cal. Ct. App. - June 3, 2010)
Off Topic: Unfortunate Trademark Infringement
Americans, Columbian commandos rescue high-profile hostages
DOJ OIG: Review of FBI's Use of Exigent Letters







