Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumTwo developments worth reading
ADVERTISEMENTS
One if the US v. Graf case that David blogged about yesterday. The other, with a hat tip to Legal Profession Blog, is a DC ethics opinion (Ethics Op. 355) explaining how to comply with In re Mance -- a case limiting the ways that lawyers can move flat fees into their general accounts. A lot of solos were moving flat fees into their general accounts earlier than may be permitted in DC.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on July 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Worth Reading--Moral Responsibility to Pay
Employment Law: Avoid Problems When Hiring
Some recommended sentencing reading after we get federal election results
Antitrust Law Developments, Sixth Edition








