ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Freedom to Differ

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Freedom to Differ

WSJ Law Blog: Lindsay Lohan?s Twitter: Your New Source of Legal Scholarship

ADVERTISEMENTS

Washington and Lee Law Professor Erik Luna found himself suddenly inundated with e-mails last week about an article he?d written 8 years ago. And it didn?t take long to discover why.

Actress Lindsay Lohan had tweeted the article, a critique of federal sentencing guidelines, after being sentenced to 90 days in jail for violating her probation on two drunk driving arrests in 2007. See here for the story in The News Leader. Here for the Daily Caller. (h/t: ABA Journal.)

Lohan was evidently unhappy about the 90 days, and so, after first bizarrely citing the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the pop icon broke Luna?s opening paragraph into tweet-size chunks and sent them hurtling through cyberspace:

November 1 marked the 15th anniversary of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. But there were no celebrations, parades, or other festivities in honor of this punishment scheme created by Congress and the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Instead, the day passed like most others during the last 15 years: Scores of federal defendants sentenced under a constitutionally perverted system that saps moral judgment through its mechanical rules.

Which is all well and good. Certainly, we have no objection to broad exposure for legal scholarship. It?s just that the article?s author says his article has almost no relevance for Lohan.

?There are a couple of problems with the reference to my paper. First, it?s dated. Since the paper?s publication in 2002, there has been a sea change in the law. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a key part of the sentencing scheme that had been the subject of my criticism,? he told The News Leader. ?More fundamentally, Ms. Lohan?s case is in the California state system, and my critique of federal sentencing has, at best, some oblique relevance to her plight.?

Despite the misuse of his work, Luna joked in an interview with the Daily Caller that his Internet fame might continue. ?I?m only hoping that Lady Gaga tweets about my Fourth Amendment work,? he said.

Luna did note to the News Leader that he was largely unfamiliar with Lohan?s work, outside of The Parent Trap, a 1998 film and a favorite of Luna?s nine-year-old daughter, Aubrey.

?I don?t believe Aubrey is familiar with subsequent chapters in Ms. Lohan?s career,? he told the News Leader, ?and that?s probably as it should be.?

via blogs.wsj.com

Full post as published by Freedom to Differ on July 14, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 01:00:54)