Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousProvisional Patent Applications
By Dennis Crouch
The number of provisional patent application filings continue to rise. Well over 100,000 provisional patent applications have been filed each of the past five years.
For many, provisional applications are seen as a low-cost mechanism for claiming a priority date and for delaying the eventual higher cost of drafting and filing a non-provisional application. (A Google search for 'provisional patent' resulted in ads for '$99 provisional patent', '$139 provisional patent', etc.) Others (especially those in the pharmaceutical industry) use provisional applications as a way to claim an additional year of at the end of the patent term.
Many patent attorneys criticize the use of provisional applications as a low-cost pathway — arguing that approach leads to a false sense of security because the low-quality applications will be insufficient to satisfy the disclosure requirements for later priority claims.
I am working on a project that looks at how patent applicants are using provisional patent applications. The heart of the project attempts to determine whether the provisional disclosure properly enables and describes the invention as eventually claimed. Those results are still pending. However, I thought I would present some preliminary information about the provisionals in our study.
Results: One of the low-cost benefits of provisional applications is that they have no formal requirements. Thus, a printed PowerPoint presentation, whitepaper, or circuit diagram could each serve as a provisional application. Patent claims are not required. However, we're finding that about 60-70% of provisional applications are filed with at least one claim. About 50–60% really look like non-provisional patent applications. Around 15% of the provisional applications are essentially a stack of presentation materials. Almost all of the provisional applications are computer generated (rather than handwritten).
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on July 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Federal Government
Florida residents sue claiming extraordinary delays in judging citizenship applications.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Yamaguchi: provisional can be prior art as of its filing date
USPTO Board Holds U.S. Provisional Application as Prior Art on its Filing Date
Presumptions about provisionals
European Patent Office Decides Divisional Applications Are Abusive
Temporary aphasia and the art of provisional patent drafting
USPTO Proposes 12 Month Extension to Provisional Patent Application Period









