ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentWI: Running noise inside showed exigency of destruction of evidence
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Officers went to defendant’s place based on an informant’s statement he was there dealing drugs and had an outstanding warrant. It was actually a commitment order for unpaid fines. When officers got there and knocked and announced, they heard running sounds inside. They could reasonably believe that the defendant was running to destroy evidence. State v. Robinson, 2010 WI 80, 2010 Wisc. LEXIS 112 (July 15, 2010).
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging that search on the ground the officers manufactured exigent circumstances where it was clear there were exigent circumstances. State v. Artic, 2010 WI 83, 2010 Wisc. LEXIS 108 (July 15, 2010).*
Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s house, and found him 1½ blocks away...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on July 19, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
LA Wildfires
Bring Widespread Destruction
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

NY: Traveling evangelist sues Ithaca over noise ordinance
Lose the Evidence - Lose the Case
Truck Accident Cases and Destruction of Evidence
Federal Judge Orders Investigation of Missing Pershing Park Evidence
TorrentSpy Loses Case Due to Destruction of Evidence








