Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Running for elected office could adversely affect individual?s continuation in his or her public employment

Running for elected office could adversely affect individual?s continuation in his or her public employment
Cusumano v Board of Commissioners, App. Div., 251 A.D.2d 404,

The Cusumano case shows that the decision of a public employee to run for public office may have an unexpected, and unintended, impact on his or her public employment.

In December the Franklin Square and Munson Fire Department held an election for members of its Board of Commissioners. Both Louis R. Cusumano and Theodore Braun submitted valid nominating petitions to run for a vacancy on the board and their names were placed on the ballot.

On the day of the election, Braun, a New York City police officer, asked the board to remove his name from the ballot. He said that he had learned that Section 1129 of the New York City Charter prohibited city police officers that accepted a nomination for elective office from continuing their employment with the city. The board refused to remove Braun?s name from the ballot. To further complicate matters, Braun was elected to the vacancy.

Cusumano sued, seeking an order directing that the election result be set aside, claiming that the board had ?improperly failed? to honor Braun?s attempt to decline his nomination. Although a State Supreme Court justice granted Cusumano?s petition, the Appellate Division reversed that ruling.

The Appellate Division pointed out that while Section 176(7) of the Town Law allows a fire district resident to file a nominating petition, there is no provision in the Town Law authorizing the removal of a candidate?s name from the ballot once he or she has filed a lawful petition.

In addition, the court commented that as ?Braun was properly nominated ... the fact that he subsequently learned that he could not continue his employment as a New York City police officer if he accepted the nomination did not disqualify him from running for office.?

Accordingly, the Court concluded that the relief Cusumano requested was not warranted because the board?s refusal to remove Braun?s name from the ballot ?cannot be considered a failure to perform a duty enjoined upon it by law....?

The decision is silent as to the impact of Braun?s nomination for, and election to, the board on his employment as a New York City police officer.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on July 20, 2010 (boomark / email).