Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Educator's ignoring repeated warnings not to engage in physical contact with students held justified termination

Educator's ignoring repeated warnings not to engage in physical contact with students held justified termination
Forte v Mills, Appellate Division, 250 A.D.2d 882

According to his supervisors at the Manhasset Union Free School District, physical educator teachers Garry Forte had a habit of poking female students in the back and occasionally ?snapped their bra straps? during physical education class. After he failed to heed repeated warnings against engaging in physical contact with his students, he was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Section 3020-a.

A Section 3020-a disciplinary hearing panel found Forte guilty of conduct unbecoming a teacher and insubordination. The panel recommended that Forte be dismissed from his position. The Commissioner of Education sustained the hearing panel?s determination and the penalty imposed.

Forte appealed the Commissioner?s determination. The Appellate Division rejected his appeal, finding that the determination (1) was neither arbitrary nor capricious; (2) was not affected by an error of law; and (3) had a rationale basis.

The decision points out that Forte admitted that he had been orally cautioned against touching students and that he continued to do so ?as part of his motivational and instructional technique.? Based on the testimony of witnesses and Forte?s admission, the court said that it found no basis to overturn the Commissioner?s determination.

As to the penalty imposed, dismissal, the Appellate Division said that ?dismissal is appropriate where a teacher, having been repeatedly warned against physical contact with students, fails to avoid such contact which, regardless of its purpose, may be interpreted by those students as sexually suggestive or harassing.?

In addition, the court pointed out that with Forte?s ?wholly disregarding the progressive discipline imposed in the past,? the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one?s sense of fairness, citing Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on July 20, 2010 (boomark / email).