Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Safety News
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: Food Safety NewsCourt Rules Farmers Can Challenge USDA Almond Rule
By Dan Flynn and Suzanna Schreck
Initiated in September of 2007, the pasteurization rule was in response to a string of Salmonella outbreaks linked to almonds in 2001 and 2004. The Almond Board of California proposed mandatory sterilization across the industry to prevent future problems and the USDA agreed to implement and enforce the new rule.
Raw and organic almond farmers pushed back over concerns about the methods of sterilization, namely over the use of propylene oxide, a probable carcinogen, to fumigate the nuts.
A group of growers has been fighting the rule since it took effect and yesterday marks the first major victory for their case.
"We are delighted by the court's decision," said Will Fantle, research director at The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisonsin-based sustainable agriculture advocacy group coordinating the legal strategy for the farmers' lawsuit.
"At long last the farmers who have been injured by this rule will have the opportunity to stand in court and state why this poorly thought out regulation should be thrown out," said Fantle in a statement yesterday.
"I am very happy with this first step in overturning this destructive regulation," said Nick Koretoff, an almond farmer and plaintiff in the lawsuit. "The treatment mandate has been a financial catastrophe for me. My consumers want raw, untreated, healthy almonds and I have been denied the opportunity to sell them what they want."
John Vetne, an attorney representing the almond farmers, said the Appeals Court made a "very strong decision affirming farmers' rights."
"We are pleased that the Appeals Court rejected USDA's argument that courthouse doors are closed to farmers. We now intend to demonstrate to the federal district court that USDA acted outside of authority granted by Congress when it denied California almond growers a consumer market for raw almonds," said Vetne.
The full court opinion is available here.
Full post as published by Food Safety News on August 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Native American Farmers, Ranchers and USDA Reach Historic Settlement
Native American Farmers, Ranchers and USDA Reach Historic Settlement
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Federal Government
alleging discrimination against black farmers
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Zurich Insurance Agrees $455M Settlement in Farmers Class Action
Zurich Insurance Agrees $455M Settlement in Farmers Class Action

Black farmers allege USDA discrimination in new class action lawsuit
International Tribunal Rules For Zimbabwe Farmers on Land Expropriation
USDA reaches $1.25 billion settlement in black farmer discrimination case
Michigan Prevails in "Mark of the Beast" Lawsuit








