ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Yankah on Liberal Virtue

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS
Ekow N. Yankah (Cardozo Law School) has posted Liberal Virtue (LAW, VIRTUE AND JUSTICE, Alalia Amaya, Ho Hock Lai, eds., Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2011) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
    If prostitution is ?the world?s oldest profession?, debate about its moral and legal permissibility is nearly as old. Powerful arguments have been made that the moral condemnation of prostitution cannot withstand philosophical scrutiny; that moral condemnation of prostitution borders on superstition and parochial conventions. A different type of reformer argues that a legitimate liberal government cannot properly prohibit prostitution; that liberalism demands that we cabin off our individual moral evaluations from the business of governance and law.

    This article takes a starkly different approach. This article does not take the view that prostitution is intractably controversial or insist on agreement with particular philosophical paradigms in order to reform prostitution laws. This article illustrates that we can respect the conviction that prostitution is immoral. The commonly held view that prostitution is morally wrong is correct or at least plausible. Examining the foundational thinkers in the two philosophical traditions, often used as foils for the other ? deontology and virtue based theories ? shows how each understands that prostitution is immoral. Rather than ask many to discard their deepest convictions, this article makes sense of the commonly held intuition that prostitution is immoral while still showing how we can garner widespread agreement on reforming the current law. Secondly and most critically, unlike decriminalization arguments that have come before, this article demonstrates how agreement on decriminalization can be reached by liberals and non-liberals alike. By showing how we can respect widely held moral conviction and reach agreement from a wide range of moral starting points, lawmakers and social reformers can be armed with the arguments needed to move reform forward.

Highly recommended.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)