Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> eLegal Canton
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: eLegal CantonWhile copyright collectives help, royalties issue muddy
By David Canton
For the London Free Press – August 16, 2010
[UPDATE: Also take a look at this related Techdirt post entitled The Insanity Of Music Licensing: In One Single Graphic ]
Radio royalties are complex.
On July 9, 2010, the Copyright Board of Canada issued its long-awaited Commercial Radio tariff and reasons. It dealt with payments radio stations must pay to copyright collectives to obtain rights to play music.
The rights to use most music flows through copyright collectives that collect royalties from broadcasters and other users, so they don’t have to deal with rights holders individually. The collectives in turn pay the royalties to the rights holders.
Even with the collectives taking the place of rights holders, the various copyright payments broadcasters must pay for music are complex. Radio stations must pay for six different rights.
The board stated:
A Canadian radio station that broadcasts recorded music off a server reproduces and communicates musical works, performers’ performances and sound recordings. Four copyrights and two remuneration rights must be accounted for.
The board estimates that commercial radio stations will pay a total of $85 million annually in royalties under the new rates, an increase of $13 million over previous rates.
Of the $85 million in royalties, the board estimates $51 million will go to SOCAN, $13 million to Re:Sound, $11 million to CSI, $10 million to AVLA/SOPROQ and $200,000 to ArtistI.
SOCAN administers the exclusive right of the owner of the copyright in a musical work to communicate it to the public by telecommunication for most composers, authors, and publishers.
The second and third rights are the remuneration rights that performers and record companies enjoy when a recording of a musical work is communicated to the public by telecommunication. Re:Sound administers these rights for most eligible performers and makers.
The fourth set of rights is the exclusive right to reproduce a musical work. CSI, SODRAC and CMRRA administer these rights.
The fifth set of rights is the exclusive right to reproduce a sound recording. AVLA and SOPROQ act for most record producers, record companies and artists.
The sixth set of rights is the exclusive right in a performer’s performance to reproduce the performance for a purpose other than the purpose for which authorization was given. ArtistI, ACTRA PRS, AFM Canada Artisl, and others administer this right.
The estimated $85 million in royalties payable by radio broadcasters does not include instances where collectives have not filed tariffs. As a result, the $85 million estimate may be understating the monies payable by radio broadcasters.
The Commercial Radio tariff is a consolidation of several proposed tariffs filed in 2007 and 2008. If the board’s decision ends up being judicially reviewed by the Federal Court of Appeal, a final decision will likely be over a year away.
Full post as published by eLegal Canton on August 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
NiSource
Settles Natural Gas Royalties Case for $380 Million
Tulsa County Natural Gas Royalties
Plaintiffs Awarded $126 Million
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
Spike Lee and Showtime
Settlement reached in script copyright infringement lawsuit.
Joke Book
Judy Brown and publishers pay undisclosed settlement to comedians and talkshow celebrities for copyright infringement.
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement

Collectivizing Rights; Privatizing Taxation: The Unarticulated Function of Copyright Collectives
Canadian Copyright Collectives and the Copyright Board
Copyright Collectives: Good Solution But for Which Problem








