ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> PomTalk

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: PomTalk

SEC Set to Approve Proxy Access, But for How Many?

By Anthony F. Maul

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Securities and Exchange Commission is meeting Wednesday to consider proposed proxy access rules that will allow shareholder nominations of board candidates and will require companies to print the names of such candidates directly onto corporate ballots.  The rules are expected to pass through the Commission on a 3-2 vote, with the two sitting Republican commissioners voting no.  However, based on recently-leaked details (the SEC has not yet officially released any details of the proposed rules), there may be reason to question just how broad the scope of the eventual proxy rules will be.

In order to prevent short-term or small-bore investors from sparking contested board elections, the proxy access rules are expected to require that investors own at least a 3% stake in a company for as long as three years before they can nominate candidates on the company?s ballot.  At first blush, that seems reasonable enough.  However, for the largest issuers, investors holding a 3% stake will amount to a very small pool indeed.  The SEC had initially proposed a ?tiered? approach that would have set the minimum stake at 1% for large companies, 3% for midsized companies, and 5% for small companies.  That rule, however, has apparently been rejected in favor of a flat requirement.

Couple that with other details leaked today and the application of the rules get even narrower.  An anonymous source tells Reuters that the SEC will likely grant a three-year grace period for ?small companies? to comply with the proxy access rules.  If that turns out to be the case, then, in the near term, the proxy rules will except the very companies most likely to have a significant pool of investors holding the minimum 3% stake to nominate board candidates.  In other words, many investors seeking to take advantage of the new proxy rules may find themselves stuck in the middle ? owning too little of the big fish to qualify for proxy access but, at the same time, unable to access the proxies of smaller companies for which they do own enough.

Full post as published by PomTalk on August 25, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)