ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> National Eminent Domain Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Real Estate & Property Law

: National Eminent Domain Blog

Living by the Rule of Law

By Alan Ackerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

In a Northern Nevada Business Weekly article, local elected officials attacked the notion that mining is of 'paramount interest', allowing private corporations to exercise the right of eminent domain.

The rule of law is one in which a statutory provision, so long as it is in the State constitutional parameters, will be upheld as valid. The legislators have a right in considering changing the statute in order to avoid the opportunity for mining companies to simply come in and acquire property.  Yet, one has to wonder whether the State constitution used unregulated activities, even of 'paramount interest' as activities which may allow for the use of eminent domain.  Clearly, our society seems to be bent on opposing regulations.  Yet, when it comes to the use of the power of eminent domain by private entities, regulation may be the only protection!

Northern Nevada Business Weekly

While a subsequent court hearing before Elko District Court Judge Andrew Puccinelli resulted in a settlement agreement between the two parties, several Nevada officials voiced surprise that a little-known provision in the 1875 law governing mining companies was used. Among them were Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie and former state archivist Guy Rocha, who was quoted as saying, 'Why this law is still on the books is questionable.'

Leslie, a Democrat from Reno who is running for the State Senate, said she will introduce legislation in the next session to eliminate the provision that says mining is of 'paramount interest' to the state and therefore the power of eminent domain may be used by private mining company.

Several people familiar with the case suggested Fronteer likely used the antiquated provision of the 1875 mining law to reboot negotiations. One was Alan Coyner, administrator of the Nevada Division of Minerals. 'The eminent domain portion of that law has probably outlived its usefulness,' he says. 'I don't think too many mining companies would disagree with her (Sheila Leslie) on that.'

Full post as published by National Eminent Domain Blog on August 27, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0118 secs (new cache)