Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

European Commission Gives Green Light to Exchange of Audit Working Papers with PCAOB

By Jim Hamilton

The European Commission has formally recognized the adequacy of the auditor oversight of the PCAOB to fulfill the requirements of the EU?s Audit Directive and, particularly, the Board?s capacity to enter into reciprocal working arrangements with EU states on the exchange of audit working papers and other relevant documents. The Commission?s decision also covers the preservation of the confidentiality of audit working papers that the PCAOB may receive from EU authorities. These reciprocal arrangements will, in the Commission?s view, reinforce international audit oversight cooperation and increase investor protection. The documents covered by the Commission?s decision are those defined under Article 47 of the Statutory Audit Directive (2006/43/EC), which are audit working papers or other documents held by auditors or audit firms relating to the audits of companies which have issued securities in the US or which form part of a group issuing statutory consolidated accounts in the US. The SEC was included in the Commission?s decision because the PCAOB falls under the oversight of the SEC

Commissioner for the Internal Market Michel Barnier said that the exchange of audit working papers is an important step in achieving the ultimate objective of equivalence of PCAOB and EU audit oversight systems. Companies have gone global and are listed on capital markets in different continents. Their auditors have followed them. Since the auditing of financial statements has moved beyond national borders, noted Commissioner Barnier, global cooperation and coordination is needed to ensure that high quality audits are carried out world-wide. One form of cooperation is the exchange of audit working papers or other documents held by auditors and audit firms.

EU members may allow the PCAOB access to audit working papers or other documents held by EU auditors or audit firms only for the exercise of the functions of public oversight, quality assurance, investigations and penalties over auditors and audit firms. Statutory audit means an audit of annual or consolidated accounts of listed companies, banks and insurance companies as required by EU law. Further, bilateral working arrangements between EU audit oversight authorities and the PCAOB have to be agreed upon before any transfer of audit working papers or other documents held by EU statutory auditors or audit firms is made to the PCAOB.

EU authorities must ensure that the bilateral working arrangements which allow for the transfer of audit working papers or other documents contain appropriate safeguards regarding the protection of personal data as well as the protection of professional secrets and sensitive commercial information mentioned in the transferred documents. This protection covers the companies whose financial statements are audited as well as the auditors of those companies. The persons employed or formerly employed by the PCAOB that receive the information must be subject to obligations of professional secrecy.

It is the individual responsibility of each EU Member State to define how an exchange of audit working papers or other documents can be carried out. A non-exhaustive list of possible ways to exchange audit working papers would be physical or electronic transmission of documents; access to documents during joint inspections of EU audit firms carried out by the EU audit regulator together with the PCAOB; and access to documents during observation of the work of EU audit regulators by the PCAOB

Former Commissioner Charlie McCreevy earlier noted that the EU's overall goal has always been to move towards full reliance on the audit inspections of the PCAOB and other public oversight bodies in non-EU countries. In practice, this would mean that audit firms from these countries would no longer have to be inspected by EU public oversight bodies since the EU could rely on the audit inspections that were carried out by their counterparts in these countries. In return, EU oversight bodies would expect the same treatment for EU audit firms. Former PCAOB Chair Mark Olson has presciently stated that there will be a transition period to full reliance during which the Board and its EU counterparts will agree on specific procedures through the execution of bilateral agreements.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on September 04, 2010 (boomark / email).