Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawEleventh Amendment immunity lost should a state adopt the Fair Labor Standards Act as state law
Mueller v Thompson, CA7, 133 F.3d 1063
In Seminole Tribe v Florida, 517 US 44, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Congress did not have the power to void a state?s Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in the federal courts by enacting legislation pursuant to the Commerce Clause.
In its ruling, the 7th Circuit pointed out that the Supreme Court said states were immune from FLSA under the Tenth Amendment [National League of Cities v Usery, 427 US 909] only to overrule that decision in Garcia v San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority [469 US 528]. However, in Garcia the Supreme Court said the FLSA applied to the states with respect to their performing ?non-traditional? governmental functions, here a public transportation system.
If a state adopts the FLSA as state law and allows state employees to sue it for alleged violations of the state?s law, has it lost its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit by its employees brought in the federal courts for alleged violations of the federal FLSA? This was the question presented to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, by the Mueller case.
The Court said that there is no waiver of a state?s Eleventh Amendment immunity ?unless the state has made its intention to waive its rights under the amendment clear.?
In 1971 Wisconsin copied the federal FLSA and made it part of its state law. In 1974 Congress amended the FLSA, making it applicable to the states and their political subdivisions.
On this legislative history, said the Court, there is ?little reason? to concluded that Wisconsin waived its immunity by adopting a state FLSA applicable to public employees as Congress had not yet authorized suing states in federal court for alleged violations of the FLSA.
New York State, in contrast, adopted overtime provisions for state workers in an effort to comply with the overtime mandates of the FLSA after Congress made the FLSA applicable to the states. Accordingly, it could be argued that New York State, as an employer, ?deliberately? waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit by state workers for alleged violations of the FLSA in federal court.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on September 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
EB-1 and EB-2 Visa Status
Obtaining a Green Card Without Going Through the Labor Certification Process
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
New Jersey Employment Law
alleged violations of New Jersey state labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
State Street Corporation 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Florida State Settles with Feds over Disclosure of Personal Driver Info
Florida State Settles with Feds over Disclosure of Personal Driver Info

Can States Have Their (Patent) Cake and Eat It, Too
Eleventh Circuit Rejects Coming to Rest Doctrine and Defines "Materials" for FLSA Cases
Californias One-Sided Patent Regime: Litigating With Immunity
Blawg of the Day -- Fair Labor Standards Act Law
FLSA Misclassification and Overtime in Retail Jobs
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, et. al. CASE








