Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawRetaliating against employees for political activity
Richardson v Saratoga Springs, App Div, 246 A.D.2d 900
Scott Richardson, one of two ?city electricians? employed by the Saratoga Springs Department of Public Works, supported his brother-in-law in a political race against the City?s incumbent Commissioner of Public Works. After the incumbent won, Richardson sued, alleging that the City had retaliated against him for his political activities by:
1. Transferring some of his duties to a co-worker, Vincent Arpey; and
2. Discontinuing his de facto status as supervisor of the entire electrical crew.
He cited Section 107 of the Civil Service Law, which provides, in pertinent part, that political opinions or affiliations may not be a consideration in the ?appointment or selection to or removal from an office or employment? (or in the discharge or promotion or reduction, or in any manner change in the official rank or compensation) of an individual whose position is subject to the Civil Service Law.?
The Appellate Division agreed, holding a jury trial was needed to determine whether Saratoga Springs violated this section of the law when it made a personnel decision that was ?affected or influenced by? an employee?s political opinion or affiliation. ?[A] reasonable factfinder could conclude that [Richardson] was discriminated against because of his political activities outside of working hours.?
The Court said discrimination could explain why Richardson?s was denied ?a promotion and concomitant salary increase -- ?for constitutionally impermissible reasons,? namely, because of his off-duty political activities.? The fact that an independent consultant actually recommended the reclassification was, according to the ruling, of little significance ?where, as here, it can be inferred that those actions were the direct consequence of the changes in the electricians? work duties ?affected or influenced by? the Commissioner.?
.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on September 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Evenflo
Recalls Children’s Activity Centers
Overtime for Programmers
alleging that some companies try to avoid paying employees overtime by categorizing them as "salaried" employees.
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
Female Employees Sue Goldman Sachs for Sex Discrimination
Female Employees Sue Goldman Sachs for Sex Discrimination
Dollar Tree Stores Hourly Employees Bring Class Action
Dollar Tree Stores Hourly Employees Bring Class Action
Wal-Mart
Must Pay $6.5 Million to Employees

Hatch Act and Federal Employee Political Restrictions
PENDING: Senate Bill 16 (Limit on-the-clock political activity of city employees)
Political Activity by Judges Spouses
NPR on the Paycheck Fairness Act
Political Activity Under the NLRA
SG urges no cert grant in third-party retaliation case







