Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportU.S. v. Terrell (9th Cir. - Sept. 13, 2010)
By Shaun Martin
ADVERTISEMENTS
Judges Kozinski, Pregerson, Reinhardt and Milan Smith. They're definitely very different. But they also have some similarities.Perhaps sometime in the past these four -- but only these four -- have signed onto something. If so, I've never seen it.
But it happens this morning. In this dissent from a denial to rehear a case en banc.
There's a lot of intellectual firepower there. Even in the context of a circuit that's very much on the bright side of the spectrum.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on September 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Calabresi & Terrell on the Unbundled Executive
A NEW P.R. FRONTIER: Someone to Tweet your events! I noticed on Facebook that Elizabeth Terrell do
Calabresi & Terrell on the Number of States & Federalism








