Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities RegulationSenator Hagan Explains Volcker Provisions of Dodd-Frank Act
By Jim Hamilton
As an added protection, Section 619(f) applies Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act to transactions between all of a banking entity?s affiliates and hedge or private equity funds where the banking entity organizes, offers, serves as an investment manager, investment adviser, or sponsor of such funds under Section 619(d). These restrictions are also applied to transactions between a banking entity?s affiliates and other funds that are controlled by a hedge or private equity fund permitted for the banking entity under 619(d). Importantly, noted Senator Hagan, these 23A and 23B restrictions do not apply to funds not controlled by funds permitted for the banking entity under Secti on 619(d), and it should also be clear that under Section 619 there are no new restrictions or limitations of any type placed on the portfolio investments of any hedge or private equity fund permitted for a banking entity under Section 619.
Also, as a condition of sponsorship, Section 619(d)(1)(G)(v) requires that a banking entity does not, directly or indirectly, guarantee or assume or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of any sponsored hedge or private equity fund or of any other hedge or private equity fund in which the sponsored fund invests. While this restricts guarantees by the banking entity as well as the insuring of obligation or performance, explained Senator Hagan, it does not limit other normal banking relations with funds merely due to a non-control investment
by a fund sponsored by the banking entity. (Cong. Record, July 15, 2010, S5889).
Section 619(f) limits transactions under 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act with a fund controlled by the banking entity or a fund sponsored by the banking entity. However, Senator Hagan noted that 619(f) does not limit in any manner transactions and normal banking relationships with a fund not controlled by the banking entity or a fund sponsored by the banking entity.
Section 619(d)(4)(I) permits certain banking entities to operate hedge and private equity funds outside of the United States provided that no ownership interest in any hedge or private equity fund is offered for sale or sold to a U.S. resident. For consistency?s sake, Senator Hagan would expect that, apart from the U.S. marketing restrictions, these provisions will be applied by the regulators in conformity with and incorporating the Federal Reserve?s current precedents, rulings, positions, and practices under Sections 4(c)(9) and 4(c)(13) of the Bank Holding Company Act so as to provide greater certainty and utilize the established legal framework for funds operated by bank holding companies outside of the United States. (Cong. Record, July 15, 2010, S5889-5890).
Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on September 14, 2010 (boomark / email).
Landlord Tenant Laws and Provisions
State and City Laws Related to Residential House and Apartment Leases
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Regulating the Field: Why I'm Not Sure Dodd-Frank Dropped the Ball on Glass-Steagall
Whistleblower provisions under Dodd-Frank
Dodd-Frank Forum - And Now for Something Completely Different
Dodd-Frank Criminal Provisions
Dodd-Frank Forum: Where's the Fiduciary Duty for Brokers
No Mandatory Arbitration of Dodd-Frank Whistleblowing Claims








