ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IPKat

Stella prize for sanitary towel competition: has the ASA boobed?

By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.

ADVERTISEMENTS
An Advertising Standards Authority adjudication last week in the UK ruled that the promoters of a competition for their product can offer third party products as prizes even without the third party's consent. In this instance, fashion house Stella McCartney Ltd objected to a promotion run by SCA Hygiene Products UK Ltd -- the manufacturers of Bodyform sanitary towels --  in which SCA offered Stella McCartney underwear as a prize. The ad ran as follows:
?New Bodyform Natural The confidence to do what comes naturally. Discover the naturally soothing sensation of Bodyform Natural our unique new range with gentle Aloe Vera and comforting camomile. You can also enter our prize draw to win £100 worth of Stella McCartney* luxury underwear everyday! And don?t forget to pick up your free sample and share your natural beauty secrets with the rest of us!"
*This is not in association with Stella McCartney.
According to the ASA, since the Bodyform ads claimed that the underwear was a product of value and a desirable prize, the public would not be likely to understand the ads as discrediting Stella McCartney Ltd or its brand. The [voluntary and toothless] Code of Advertising does not require a sales promoter to obtain a third party's consent before referring to its brand. Referring to a third party brand would not even be seen by the public as constituting an endorsement.

The IPKat wonders whether this position is consonant with the view that the Court of Justice of the European Union, makes this a trade mark infringement.  According to some, C-57/08 COPAD v Dior supports the argument that, where the third party brand has an aura of luxury, its distribution as a prize in a sanitary towel competition would damage that aura of luxury and might be opposed even if SCA lawfully purchased its prize knickers in the normal course of trade.

Underwear for cats here
"Change your underwear, change your life" here

Full post as published by IPKat on September 20, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/04/26 02:33:20)