ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Blog of Rights

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: Blog of Rights

DADT on Trial: Decision Expected Friday!

By Suzanne Ito, ACLU

ADVERTISEMENTS

This week, the ACLU of Washington was before the U.S. District Court in Tacoma representing Maj. Margaret Witt, a decorated U.S. Air Force flight nurse who was dismissed under the discriminatory and counterproductive policy known as 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' (DADT).

The landmark trial of Maj. Margaret Witt wrapped up yesterday, and Judge Ronald B. Leighton announced that he will deliver his decision this Friday at 1:30 PM PDT.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports:

As [Maj. Witt's] trial closed, [Judge Leighton] expressed strong doubts about government arguments seeking to have her dismissal upheld.

[…]In 2006, Leighton rejected Witt's claims that the Air Force violated her rights when it fired her under the "don't ask, don't tell" law. An appeals court panel overruled him two years later and said the military can't fire people for being gay unless it shows their dismissal was necessary to further military goals.

The ruling left it to Leighton to determine whether her firing met that standard. At the end of a six-day trial, he suggested the ruling tied his hands.

"I made my call with regard to whether this act was constitutional," he said. "My colleagues - my friends - said, 'Ron, you got it wrong,'" Leighton said during an extensive back-and-forth with a Justice Department lawyer. "They told me what I needed to do, what I needed to ask."

The Seattle Times also noted Judge Leighton's skepticism, writing: "[A]s the trial closed he expressed strong doubts about arguments made by government lawyers seeking to have Witt's dismissal upheld."

President Obama vowed to repeal DADT this year, and earlier this month, a judge ruled DADT unconstitutional. The executive and judicial branches have spoken. It's time for Congress to repeal DADT once and for all.

Since 1993, more than 13,000 service members have been discharged due to their sexual orientation. At least 240 of those service members have been discharged since President Obama took office. While the Senate failed to take up the Defense Authorization Act and DADT repeal Tuesday, the issue will be back in a matter of weeks, and it is critical to keep the pressure on. Join the ACLU in urging Congress to act this year to finally end DADT once and for all.

Full post as published by Blog of Rights on September 22, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0181 secs (new cache)