Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael GeistThe CIRA Election - Cast Your Vote Now
By Michael Geist
ADVERTISEMENTS
In this election, CIRA members can vote for one member-nominated candidate and up to four nominating committee candidates. I should note that this is a broken system as the nominating committee has created signicant board upheaval and loss of institutional memory. Meanwhile the CIRA members are left to select only one of their nominated candidates.
On the member nominated side, I supported Bill Reid. This was a particularly difficult choice as members nominated several excellent candidates, including Zak Muscovitch, who ran a campaign with an unprecedented effort to engage the membership on the issues, establishing a campaign site, posting lengthy essays on key issues, and generally raising the awareness of CIRA policy. While I think Muscovitch's campaign should serve as a model for future campaigns, I felt most comfortable supporting Reid, a CIRA director for the past four years with decades of computer science and Internet experience. His response to CIRA's biggest challenges, which included Internet governance and net neutrality, highlights his commitment to policy issues and the public interest.
On the nominating committee side, I supported Paul Andersen (the current CIRA chair who has worked to move the organization forward on some key issues), Martin Kratz (a well known technology law lawyer), Rowena Liang (board and corporate experience) and John King (online education experience).
Full post as published by Michael Geist on September 27, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

VOTE, VOTe, VOte, Vote, vote, votE, voTE, vOTE, VOTE...
Alasdair MacIntyre on the Election (of 2004)
Christian Institute launches election briefing
EMusic hit by domain chill in Canada









