ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> ThePopTort

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: ThePopTort

Suing Newspapers

By Joe Consumer

ADVERTISEMENTS

800px-David_BeckhamYa know, celebrities aren?t the only ones who sue newspapers.  I know it might seem that way if you follow the news.  For example, you might have heard (since it was all over the press yesterday) that David Beckham just sued In Touch magazine for saying he had ?a threesome with call-girl Irma Nici.?  Demi Moore just settled a case against an Australian tabloid for publishing a ?series of black and white shots of herself, her daughter Rumer Willis, rapper P. Diddy, and actors Cameron Diaz and Orlando Bloom.?   (Not that we?re ignoring Paris Hilton?s recently successful suit against Hallmark for using her picture and her catchphrase, "That's Hot!", but let?s get back to newspapers.)

Yesterday, a New York City federal judge refused to dismiss an employment retaliation case against the New York Post, filed by, ?Sandra Guzman, a black and Puerto Rican associate editor [who] alleged she was fired September 29, 2009, in retaliation for her complaints over inappropriate conduct, including one senior executive she accused of referring to her as "Cha Cha #1."  According to the Huffington Post (which has the actual court ruling):

In her complaint, Guzman leveled several headline-grabbing charges about the Post's working environment. Editor-in-Chief Col Allen was painted as sexist and domineering -- allegedly showing a picture of a "naked man lewdly and openly displaying his penis." Guzman said she was subjected to misogynistic taunts, including being called "Cha Cha #1." With respect to the paper's editorial slants, not especially pertinent to her lawsuit, Guzman said the Post's D.C. bureau chief stated that the publication's goal was to "destroy Barack Obama."

Of course, this raise some thorny First Amendment issues, which the Court addressed this way:

Mindful of the First Amendment protections enjoyed by newspaper organizations, the court notes that plaintiff has sufficiently alleged that she objected not just to the paper's content but to the general work environment at the Post and the way the editorial staff dealt with the publication of the content at issue.

Full post as published by ThePopTort on September 28, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/02/26 23:57:19)