ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Disability Law Blogs -> Personal Injury and Social Security Disability Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Disability Law

: Personal Injury and Social Security Disability Blog

J&J CEO Admits Lax Quality Standards Led to Recalls

By Robert Kraft

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Los Angeles Times reports, "The head of pharmaceuticals giant Johnson & Johnson, testifying on the massive recall of its widely used children's pain relievers, admitted Thursday that 'we did not maintain our high quality standards,'" and consequently, "children do not have access to our important medicines," Chief Executive William C. Weldon said. He also "told a congressional committee that the company is spending $100 million to fix quality problems that led to last spring's recall of children's over-the-counter medications, including children's Tylenol," and he "acknowledged mishandling two other recalls at his company's McNeil Consumer Healthcare subsidiary."

The AP reports that "Weldon told House lawmakers the company 'made a mistake' in conducting the so-called 'phantom recall,' which is one of a string of problems that have drawn congressional scrutiny." During "the same committee hearing, the FDA's deputy commissioner, Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, said his agency should have acted sooner to halt J&J's plan. At the same time, though, he stressed that regulators were not aware of the deceptive nature of the recall." Sharfstein explained that "J&J informed the FDA of its plan to repurchase the pills -- which did not dissolve correctly -- in April 2009," and the agency urged J&J to conduct a recall in July. But, Sharfstein stated, "In my opinion, that message should have been given sooner."

Nevertheless, Sharfstein emphasized that J&J "did not fully disclose the likely scale of the action or the way that the company was intending to proceed" in conducting the "phantom recall," theFinancial Times says. In addition, Sharfstein pointed out that the FDA "does not have legal authority to approve the manner in which the firm conducts the recall or to direct the firm to adopt a different recall strategy."

From the American Association for Justice news release.

Full post as published by Personal Injury and Social Security Disability Blog on October 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 10:06:53)