Academic

THE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS WAS WRONG: Overestimate fueled state?s landmark diesel law. ?California g?

By Glenn Reynolds

THE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS WAS WRONG: Overestimate fueled state’s landmark diesel law. “California grossly miscalculated pollution levels in a scientific analysis used to toughen the state’s clean-air standards, and scientists have spent the past several months revising data and planning a significant weakening of the landmark regulation, The Chronicle has found. The pollution estimate in question was too high – by 340 percent, according to the California Air Resources Board, the state agency charged with researching and adopting air quality standards. . . . Mary Nichols, chairwoman of the California Air Resources Board, offered no explanation when The Chronicle questioned her about the diesel emissions miscalculation. She was recently asked why the air board estimate of a nitrous oxide source was off by at least a factor of two – air board scientists have since revised their numbers, and data show the estimate was off by 340 percent. Nichols’ response: ‘I can’t answer that for you.’”

The Air Board has had problems for a while. They haven’t gotten much press, though.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on October 08, 2010 (boomark / email).