Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Illinois Appellate Lawyer BlogTrial Court?s Dismissal Of Appeal Deprives Appellate Court Of Jurisdiction
By Steven R. Merican
Bernstein and Grazian had a falling out, so they folded their law practice. Grazian started his own firm, and took some cases with him from the firm he had with Bernstein. The two lawyers fought over how much each should be paid for those files. Bernstein sued Grazian, who countersued Bernstein. Unhappy with the result in the trial court, Bernstein appealed. Grazian filed a counter appeal.
Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 309, Bernstein asked the trial court to dismiss his appeal. The trial court obliged, but Bernstein told the appellate court his request to dismiss his appeal was a mistake. He asked the appellate court to reinstate his appeal. A single judge of the appellate court obliged that request . But Grazian asserted the earlier dismissal by the trial court deprived the appellate court of jurisdiction to reinstate the appeal.
The First District Illinois Appellate Court agreed with Grazian. Here is the court?s rationale:
Once the trial court properly dismissed Bernstein?s appeal pursuant to Rule 309 upon his own motion, it was as if Bernstein had never filed a notice of appeal in our court. Instead ? jurisdiction revested with the trial court. The only recourse for Bernstein, then, to move jurisdiction to our court was to petition the trial court to vacate its dismissal or ? file another notice of appeal from the original judgment in the cause ? some similar action taken within 30 days of the trial court?s final and appealable order dismissing his appeal.
The lesson is: The appellate court cannot regain jurisdiction after the trial court has legitimately dismissed a notice of appeal under authority given by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 309. Read the whole opinion, which includes a host of other jurisdictional arguments, Bernstein and Grazian v. Grazan and Volpe, No. 1-09-0149 (6/25/10), by clicking here.
Full post as published by Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog on October 10, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Trial Court Could Not Enter Permanent Injunction While Appeal Was Pending
Trial Court's Jurisdiction After Remand From Appellate Court Is Limited By Mandate
Plaintiff's Requested Dismissal May Provide Controverted Final Judgment for Appeal
Successive 60(b) Motions Not Allowed
Appeal Dismissed; Trial Court Lacked Jurisdiction








